← All comparisons

DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-4o mini: token pricing & cost compared (July 2026)

How DeepSeek V3.2 (DeepSeek) and GPT-4o mini (OpenAI) actually compare on price — input, output, and total monthly cost at the MAU you care about. Updated against live OpenRouter pricing.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

Input
$0.23 / 1M tokens
Output
$0.34 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio
1.5×
Context window
131.072K

OpenAI

GPT-4o mini

Input
$0.15 / 1M tokens
Output
$0.60 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio
4.0×
Context window
128K

The short answer

DeepSeek V3.2 wins for output-heavy work (chat, generation). GPT-4o mini wins for input-heavy work (RAG, summarisation, classification).

Token pricing side-by-side

Input ($/1M)Output ($/1M)$0$0.15$0.3$0.45$0.6
  • DeepSeek V3.2
  • GPT-4o mini

Cost at your usage

DeepSeek V3.2

Per call

$0.00029

Per user / mo

$0.0286

Total / mo

$29

GPT-4o mini

Per call

$0.00037

Per user / mo

$0.0375

Total / mo

$37

DeepSeek V3.2 is cheaper by $0.0089/user/month — a saving of $9/month at 1,000 MAU.

Total monthly bill across MAU

1005001K5K10K50K100K$0$950$2K$3K$4K
  • DeepSeek V3.2
  • GPT-4o mini

Same usage profile applied to both models; only the per-token price differs.

Run this against your real numbers

The mini-calculator above is a preview. Use the full tools to model power-user blast radius, gross margin, and 12-month spend forecasts.

Comparing DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-4o mini on price alone never tells the whole story — output-token weighting, context length, and your usage profile change the answer dramatically. Use the calculators below for the full picture.

Related tools: All comparisons · Cost Per User Calculator · How to calculate LLM cost per user