DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: token pricing & cost compared (July 2026)

How DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek) and Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) actually compare on price — input, output, and total monthly cost at the MAU you care about. Updated against live OpenRouter pricing.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Input: $0.43 / 1M tokens
Output: $0.87 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio: 2.0×
Context window: 1,048.576K

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Input: $3.00 / 1M tokens
Output: $15.00 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio: 5.0×
Context window: 1,000K

The short answer

DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper across the board for typical workloads.

Token pricing side-by-side

DeepSeek V4 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Cost at your usage

Avg input tokens / call

Avg output tokens / call

Calls per active user / day: 5

Active days / month: 20

MAU: 1,000

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Per call

$0.00065

Per user / mo

$0.0653

Total / mo

$65

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Per call

$0.00900

Per user / mo

$0.9000

Total / mo

$900

DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper by $0.8347/user/month — a saving of $835/month at 1,000 MAU.

Total monthly bill across MAU

DeepSeek V4 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Same usage profile applied to both models; only the per-token price differs.

Run this against your real numbers

The mini-calculator above is a preview. Use the full tools to model power-user blast radius, gross margin, and 12-month spend forecasts.

Other comparisons

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-5.1 Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.1 Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro o4-mini vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Comparing DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 on price alone never tells the whole story — output-token weighting, context length, and your usage profile change the answer dramatically. Use the calculators below for the full picture.