← All comparisons

GPT-4o mini vs Claude Haiku 4.5: token pricing & cost compared (July 2026)

How GPT-4o mini (OpenAI) and Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) actually compare on price — input, output, and total monthly cost at the MAU you care about. Updated against live OpenRouter pricing.

OpenAI

GPT-4o mini

Input
$0.15 / 1M tokens
Output
$0.60 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio
4.0×
Context window
128K

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

Input
$1.00 / 1M tokens
Output
$5.00 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio
5.0×
Context window
200K

The short answer

GPT-4o mini is cheaper across the board for typical workloads.

Token pricing side-by-side

Input ($/1M)Output ($/1M)$0$2$4$6$8
  • GPT-4o mini
  • Claude Haiku 4.5

Cost at your usage

GPT-4o mini

Per call

$0.00037

Per user / mo

$0.0375

Total / mo

$37

Claude Haiku 4.5

Per call

$0.00300

Per user / mo

$0.3000

Total / mo

$300

GPT-4o mini is cheaper by $0.2625/user/month — a saving of $263/month at 1,000 MAU.

Total monthly bill across MAU

1005001K5K10K50K100K$0$8K$15K$23K$30K
  • GPT-4o mini
  • Claude Haiku 4.5

Same usage profile applied to both models; only the per-token price differs.

Run this against your real numbers

The mini-calculator above is a preview. Use the full tools to model power-user blast radius, gross margin, and 12-month spend forecasts.

GPT-4o mini vs Claude Haiku 4.5: the definitive budget-model comparison

GPT-4o mini and Claude Haiku 4.5 are the flagship budget models from OpenAI and Anthropic respectively — and the most-searched comparison for teams trying to keep API spend under control. Both deliver strong capability at a fraction of frontier model prices, but which one is cheaper depends on your input/output token ratio, not the headline number.

Output-heavy workloads (chat, code generation, summarisation) are governed by the output token price. Input-heavy workloads (RAG retrieval, classification, document analysis) are governed by the input token price. Most teams find the cheaper model is the one that matches their workload shape — use the calculator above with your real token counts to get a definitive answer.

Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic's fastest, cheapest model and responds best to explicit XML-tagged system prompts. Its 200K context window (vs GPT-4o mini's 128K) can eliminate chunking overhead for long-document tasks. GPT-4o mini benefits from OpenAI's scale and broad ecosystem — it's the default pick for teams already on the OpenAI stack who want to cut costs without migrating.

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4o mini cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5?

It depends on your token ratio. GPT-4o mini is priced at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens via OpenRouter. Claude Haiku 4.5 is in a similar band. Plug your actual avg input/output tokens per call into the calculator above to get an exact monthly figure for your usage.

Which model is better for RAG and document processing?

RAG pipelines are input-heavy — you're stuffing context windows with retrieved chunks and getting short structured responses back. Compare input token prices first, then factor in context window limits. Claude Haiku 4.5's 200K context window can reduce the number of chunked calls needed on long documents, which may offset a higher per-token price.

Can I use Claude Haiku 4.5 as a drop-in for GPT-4o mini?

For most classification, routing, and summarisation tasks — yes, with prompt adjustments. Anthropic models respond better to explicit XML-tagged system prompts (e.g. <task>, <context>). For function calling and JSON output, both models perform comparably. Expect a 1–2 day prompt-tuning pass to fully leverage Haiku 4.5.

What's the context window difference?

GPT-4o mini supports up to 128K context tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports up to 200K. For very long documents, Haiku 4.5's larger window can eliminate chunking entirely — which reduces call count, latency, and often total cost even at a similar per-token price.

Which model has lower latency?

Both are optimised for low-latency inference. GPT-4o mini benefits from OpenAI's globally distributed infrastructure. Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic's fastest tier. Actual latency depends on region, prompt size, and time of day — benchmark both with your specific prompt template before committing.

Comparing GPT-4o mini vs Claude Haiku 4.5 on price alone never tells the whole story — output-token weighting, context length, and your usage profile change the answer dramatically. Use the calculators below for the full picture.

Related tools: All comparisons · Cost Per User Calculator · How to calculate LLM cost per user