← All comparisons

GPT-5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.7: token pricing & cost compared (July 2026)

How GPT-5.5 (OpenAI) and Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic) actually compare on price — input, output, and total monthly cost at the MAU you care about. Updated against live OpenRouter pricing.

OpenAI

GPT-5.5

Input
$5.00 / 1M tokens
Output
$30.00 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio
6.0×
Context window
1,050K

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.7

Input
$5.00 / 1M tokens
Output
$25.00 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio
5.0×
Context window
1,000K

The short answer

Claude Opus 4.7 is cheaper across the board for typical workloads.

Token pricing side-by-side

Input ($/1M)Output ($/1M)$0$8$16$24$32
  • GPT-5.5
  • Claude Opus 4.7

Cost at your usage

GPT-5.5

Per call

$0.01750

Per user / mo

$1.7500

Total / mo

$1,750

Claude Opus 4.7

Per call

$0.01500

Per user / mo

$1.5000

Total / mo

$1,500

Claude Opus 4.7 is cheaper by $0.2500/user/month — a saving of $250/month at 1,000 MAU.

Total monthly bill across MAU

1005001K5K10K50K100K$0$45K$90K$135K$180K
  • GPT-5.5
  • Claude Opus 4.7

Same usage profile applied to both models; only the per-token price differs.

Run this against your real numbers

The mini-calculator above is a preview. Use the full tools to model power-user blast radius, gross margin, and 12-month spend forecasts.

Comparing GPT-5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.7 on price alone never tells the whole story — output-token weighting, context length, and your usage profile change the answer dramatically. Use the calculators below for the full picture.

Related tools: All comparisons · Cost Per User Calculator · How to calculate LLM cost per user