← All comparisons

Llama 3.3 70B vs Claude 3.5 Haiku: token pricing & cost compared (July 2026)

How Llama 3.3 70B (Meta) and Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) actually compare on price — input, output, and total monthly cost at the MAU you care about. Updated against live OpenRouter pricing.

Meta

Llama 3.3 70B

Input
$0.00 / 1M tokens
Output
$0.00 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio
Context window

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Input
$0.00 / 1M tokens
Output
$0.00 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio
Context window

The short answer

Llama 3.3 70B and Claude 3.5 Haiku are priced identically per token — pick on quality, latency, or context window instead.

Token pricing side-by-side

Input ($/1M)Output ($/1M)$0$1$2$3$4
  • Llama 3.3 70B
  • Claude 3.5 Haiku

Cost at your usage

Llama 3.3 70B

Per call

$0.00000

Per user / mo

$0.0000

Total / mo

$0

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Per call

$0.00000

Per user / mo

$0.0000

Total / mo

$0

Total monthly bill across MAU

1005001K5K10K50K100K$0$1$2$3$4
  • Llama 3.3 70B
  • Claude 3.5 Haiku

Same usage profile applied to both models; only the per-token price differs.

Run this against your real numbers

The mini-calculator above is a preview. Use the full tools to model power-user blast radius, gross margin, and 12-month spend forecasts.

Comparing Llama 3.3 70B vs Claude 3.5 Haiku on price alone never tells the whole story — output-token weighting, context length, and your usage profile change the answer dramatically. Use the calculators below for the full picture.

Related tools: All comparisons · Cost Per User Calculator · How to calculate LLM cost per user

Loading live prices…