← All comparisons

Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 4 Maverick: token pricing & cost compared (July 2026)

How Llama 4 Scout (Meta) and Llama 4 Maverick (Meta) actually compare on price — input, output, and total monthly cost at the MAU you care about. Updated against live OpenRouter pricing.

Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Input
$0.10 / 1M tokens
Output
$0.30 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio
3.0×
Context window
10,000K

Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

Input
$0.15 / 1M tokens
Output
$0.60 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio
4.0×
Context window
1,048.576K

The short answer

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper across the board for typical workloads.

Token pricing side-by-side

Input ($/1M)Output ($/1M)$0$0.15$0.3$0.45$0.6
  • Llama 4 Scout
  • Llama 4 Maverick

Cost at your usage

Llama 4 Scout

Per call

$0.00020

Per user / mo

$0.0200

Total / mo

$20

Llama 4 Maverick

Per call

$0.00037

Per user / mo

$0.0375

Total / mo

$37

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper by $0.0175/user/month — a saving of $17/month at 1,000 MAU.

Total monthly bill across MAU

1005001K5K10K50K100K$0$950$2K$3K$4K
  • Llama 4 Scout
  • Llama 4 Maverick

Same usage profile applied to both models; only the per-token price differs.

Run this against your real numbers

The mini-calculator above is a preview. Use the full tools to model power-user blast radius, gross margin, and 12-month spend forecasts.

Comparing Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 4 Maverick on price alone never tells the whole story — output-token weighting, context length, and your usage profile change the answer dramatically. Use the calculators below for the full picture.

Related tools: All comparisons · Cost Per User Calculator · How to calculate LLM cost per user