← All comparisons

o3 vs Claude Opus 4.7: token pricing & cost compared (July 2026)

How o3 (OpenAI) and Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic) actually compare on price — input, output, and total monthly cost at the MAU you care about. Updated against live OpenRouter pricing.

OpenAI

o3

Input
$2.00 / 1M tokens
Output
$8.00 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio
4.0×
Context window
200K

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.7

Input
$5.00 / 1M tokens
Output
$25.00 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio
5.0×
Context window
1,000K

The short answer

o3 is cheaper across the board for typical workloads.

Token pricing side-by-side

Input ($/1M)Output ($/1M)$0$7$14$21$28
  • o3
  • Claude Opus 4.7

Cost at your usage

o3

Per call

$0.00500

Per user / mo

$0.5000

Total / mo

$500

Claude Opus 4.7

Per call

$0.01500

Per user / mo

$1.5000

Total / mo

$1,500

o3 is cheaper by $1.0000/user/month — a saving of $1,000/month at 1,000 MAU.

Total monthly bill across MAU

1005001K5K10K50K100K$0$40K$80K$120K$160K
  • o3
  • Claude Opus 4.7

Same usage profile applied to both models; only the per-token price differs.

Run this against your real numbers

The mini-calculator above is a preview. Use the full tools to model power-user blast radius, gross margin, and 12-month spend forecasts.

Comparing o3 vs Claude Opus 4.7 on price alone never tells the whole story — output-token weighting, context length, and your usage profile change the answer dramatically. Use the calculators below for the full picture.

Related tools: All comparisons · Cost Per User Calculator · How to calculate LLM cost per user