Qwen 2.5 72B vs DeepSeek V3: token pricing & cost compared (July 2026)
How Qwen 2.5 72B (Qwen) and DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek) actually compare on price — input, output, and total monthly cost at the MAU you care about. Updated against live OpenRouter pricing.
Qwen
Qwen 2.5 72B
- Input
- $0.36 / 1M tokens
- Output
- $0.40 / 1M tokens
- Output / Input ratio
- 1.1×
- Context window
- 131.072K
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V3
- Input
- $0.20 / 1M tokens
- Output
- $0.80 / 1M tokens
- Output / Input ratio
- 4.0×
- Context window
- 131.072K
The short answer
Qwen 2.5 72B wins for output-heavy work (chat, generation). DeepSeek V3 wins for input-heavy work (RAG, summarisation, classification).
Token pricing side-by-side
- Qwen 2.5 72B
- DeepSeek V3
Cost at your usage
Qwen 2.5 72B
Per call
$0.00038
Per user / mo
$0.0380
Total / mo
$38
DeepSeek V3
Per call
$0.00050
Per user / mo
$0.0500
Total / mo
$50
Total monthly bill across MAU
- Qwen 2.5 72B
- DeepSeek V3
Same usage profile applied to both models; only the per-token price differs.
Run this against your real numbers
The mini-calculator above is a preview. Use the full tools to model power-user blast radius, gross margin, and 12-month spend forecasts.
Other comparisons
Comparing Qwen 2.5 72B vs DeepSeek V3 on price alone never tells the whole story — output-token weighting, context length, and your usage profile change the answer dramatically. Use the calculators below for the full picture.
Related tools: All comparisons · Cost Per User Calculator · How to calculate LLM cost per user