Qwen 2.5 72B vs Llama 3.3 70B: token pricing & cost compared (July 2026)

How Qwen 2.5 72B (Qwen) and Llama 3.3 70B (Meta) actually compare on price — input, output, and total monthly cost at the MAU you care about. Updated against live OpenRouter pricing.

Qwen

Qwen 2.5 72B

Input: $0.36 / 1M tokens
Output: $0.40 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio: 1.1×
Context window: 131.072K

Llama 3.3 70B

Input: $0.10 / 1M tokens
Output: $0.32 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio: 3.2×
Context window: 131.072K

The short answer

Llama 3.3 70B is cheaper across the board for typical workloads.

Token pricing side-by-side

Qwen 2.5 72B
Llama 3.3 70B

Cost at your usage

Avg input tokens / call

Avg output tokens / call

Calls per active user / day: 5

Active days / month: 20

MAU: 1,000

Qwen 2.5 72B

Per call

$0.00038

Per user / mo

$0.0380

Total / mo

$38

Llama 3.3 70B

Per call

$0.00021

Per user / mo

$0.0210

Total / mo

$21

Llama 3.3 70B is cheaper by $0.0170/user/month — a saving of $17/month at 1,000 MAU.

Total monthly bill across MAU

Qwen 2.5 72B
Llama 3.3 70B

Same usage profile applied to both models; only the per-token price differs.

Run this against your real numbers

The mini-calculator above is a preview. Use the full tools to model power-user blast radius, gross margin, and 12-month spend forecasts.

Other comparisons

Llama 3.3 70B vs GPT-4o mini Llama 3.3 70B vs Claude 3.5 Haiku Llama 3.1 70B vs Llama 3.3 70B Mixtral 8x22B vs Llama 3.3 70B Qwen 2.5 72B vs DeepSeek V3

Comparing Qwen 2.5 72B vs Llama 3.3 70B on price alone never tells the whole story — output-token weighting, context length, and your usage profile change the answer dramatically. Use the calculators below for the full picture.